Buy Our Cool TShirts Claim Your Journey

Thoughts on community

Yesterday, a friend posted a link to an article about the way that commercialization of races has affected the sport. Specifically, the author focuses on the Competitor Group and the way that their Rock ‘n’ Roll series of races draw people to the sport for the wrong reasons, that the well-attended races have all but demolished the more indie running culture of the past, that RnR series races are for “your bucket list (half) marathoner, who will run it or walk it once or twice, and spend a lot of money on memorabilia.”

easy payday loans and secure !

This post ignited a firestorm of comments, from me (probably the newest and most inexperienced runner in the pack) to seasoned trail runners to coaches to race directors. I went on a short run to think about it all after work. Conclusion? My head is still spinning.

Today, with the benefit of races like the Jazz Half Marathon and the Louisiana Marathon half under my belt, I better understand the criticism of the large, commercialized race that’s engineered to appeal to people who might not run otherwise. You may have read about my first half marathon, the Rock ‘n’ Roll Mardi Gras half marathon in 2011, and what a personal milestone that was. It changed the way I thought about my abilities—me, the swimmer who had struggled with running injuries almost to the point of giving up, but had now done something I never thought possible. I don’t know that I’d have run four half marathons now, with more on the horizon, without the incredibly rewarding experience of that race. I don’t know that I’d love running if I’d never run that first half. And this year’s experience running it with a first-timer was pretty awesome.

But my point here isn’t to defend Competitor, since it’s unlikely I’ll run RnR New Orleans again and instead plan to run smaller, local races that fit better with my schedule and that I prefer to run for various reasons (lower registration fees among them). I don’t wish to defend Competitor. To me, my issue is with this blog post, and many of the comments it received, that reek of elitism.

I understand what’s happening to long-distance running. I get that it’s not the same—that parks and neighborhood streets alike seem to be crowded with people training for something or another. To the runners who have been in the game since the days when running wasn’t cool, I get it. I understand your frustration. But to say things like you’ll stick to the relatively untouched trails because they’re free of “idiots,” whether corporations or individuals, is another thing entirely. Some of those comments made me feel as though I found my way into running the wrong way, that I’m a sheep running my lousy 10:00 miles on paved roads instead of trails, that I am unworthy of calling myself a runner. Cool, thanks for that.

There might be nearly a billion articles and impassioned blog posts that affirm one thing we have in common—we who like to put on shoes (or not) and enjoy the outdoors (or treadmill) in search of something that brings us joy—we’re all runners. It doesn’t matter if you run fast, run in minimalist shoes, run only on trails, or run without music. It doesn’t matter if you got started running RnR races or as a kid on your soccer team. It simply doesn’t matter. While I wholeheartedly believe that competitiveness has a place in sports, I don’t believe elitism does. None of us are elite runners by the definition, anyway.

So here’s my point: running is open to everyone. Need I remind you that women weren’t allowed to run major races, let alone even encouraged to run, until recent decades? I think many would agree that until corporations became involved, running was particularly exclusionary and unwelcoming to those who wanted to try it out. I can’t find a reason to be nostalgic for this time that some runners now herald as the glory days of the sport. Few of us would fit in or feel welcome, given that climate.

With the Summer Olympics on the way in a few short months, running will be thrust into the media spotlight in a way the sport rarely is. And I, for one, am happy this time around there will be more of us educated about the sport, feeling a connection to those true elite athletes at the pinnacle of the sport, and experiencing the ups and downs of that level of competition as if the race being run were our own. Whether we’re professional runners or first-timers afraid in coming in last at a 5K doesn’t matter. Each of us is a part of this community, which I believe to be welcoming, encouraging, and inspiring. Let’s keep it that way.

Posted: May 4, 2012 by

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=49709682 Adam Rabo

    I read this article yesterday also.  I normally enjoy the blog and his thoughts on running, however, I really couldn’t get behind this.  We should be happy that people are taking to running and improving their health and well being.  If it takes a RnR marathon to do that for some one then so be it.  

    • http://www.katherineswims.com Katherine McCoy

      Completely agree with you, Adam. And given the marketing dollars behind their races, it’s not a surprise that people find out about them and try it out. I had 4 friends do RnR NO as their first half this year. Smaller races don’t seem as comfortable, I think, and there’s kind of this sense of security in registering for a large race with a big name behind it when you’re taking the plunge for the first time.

  • Jeff Edmonds

    Hi Katharine,

    First off, thanks for taking the time to think through and comment on my blog post. You make a lot of good points here. The post certainly was a defense of a form of elitism, but I did not want to express the view that new runners are “idiots” or “sheep,” nor do I endorse the ideas of the commenters on the blog.

    As to your point about the old culture of running and its exclusiveness, I think I would agree with you on that. But I guess I just wanted to point out that in some ways we can’t have it all. The new culture of running is also exclusionary; it’s makes some very good things possible, and it also leaves behind some things that I guess I would like to see preserved. I suppose I just wanted to say a few words on behalf of those things.

    I also wanted to struggle openly and honestly with the “elitist” aspect of the sport. Should Competitor Group eliminate prize money? Should the faster runners be given prizes? Or, are these acts outmoded and elitist? These are tough questions, and I am not sure I know the answers, but I do want to think them through before we decide as a community to discard these practices.

    As you say clearly, though I am faster than many runners, I am not elite, and I relate to the sport and my fellow runners in many ways that are not competitive or elitist. I love running because it relaxes me, because of my friends, because of the challenge of pushing myself, for the memories. The intent of my post was not to belittle newer or less experienced runners, but to attempt to articulate the place that elitism plays in our sport and maybe even in the culture at large. 

    I think it’s possible that a case can be made for “democratic elitism” without belittling the experiences of others. Your post shows me that I didn’t quite get there, but that was my intent.

    Cheers,
    Jeff (from The Logic of Long Distance)

  • Nader Abadir

     Katherine, 

    You raise some interesting points.  

    I have to admit, I find your reference to the exclusion of women from races a bit off-point, if not cynical. It was precisely the point of the author that the praiseworthy elitism is an elitism of *merit*.  He would find exclusion based on an immutable characteristic (i.e., gender) totally antithetical to a merit-based elitism.  

    The reason I find the reference to gender discrimination a bit cynical is that you are a reader of his blog.  It is pretty clear that he is a social progressive.  

    You are right, running IS open to everyone. I was wide open to me (and I walked right through the door) well before I read O.A.R or the Logic of Long Distance blog.  It was opened to me *well* before I broke four hours at the marathon.  

    Yet, as a relatively new runner, I read *Once a Runner* with great pleasure, not because it described a club of elite runners to which I belonged, but because it celebrated values that have I always cherished, the ones celebrated in the blog post.   These are values threatened not by “slow” people, but by the commercial interests that want to take something good and devalue it (to everyone’s detriment) for pecuniary interests (their own)

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Becky-Nick-Cronan/100000065465263 Becky Nick Cronan

    I was never good at choosing sides on a debate.  Both points are valid: Big races are fun for the fanfare and crowds, but take away the intimacy you experience on the small races.  I had a beer with the race directors of the Sulphur Park to Park Half while I don’t even know who’s in charge of the Houston marathon, though he/she throws a hell of a party.  To be honest, both are good for the sport in their own way.
    I love running because everyone is pretty mellow and encouraging to each other at all levels.  A debate of whether a runner qualifies to be in the club or not, or if you’re just a sheep-like poser; it just seems against the spirit of the sport.  Or I misread the article and got lost.  -Nick

  • Pingback: Featured Blog Post: Thoughts On Community - Claim Your Journey

Back to top